Anya Salhi, July 19, 2023
In the modern business landscape, cloud-native development has become a crucial strategy for staying competitive. By adopting cloud-native practices, businesses can create applications specifically designed for the cloud, utilising microservices architecture, containers, and other contemporary tools. This approach empowers organisations to accelerate their application development process, seamlessly scale their systems, and swiftly adapt to evolving customer demands, ensuring they stay ahead of the curve in today’s fast-paced world.
When implementing Kubernetes in modern applications, the journey is far from smooth sailing. Behind the allure of scalability and container orchestration lies a landscape with hidden challenges and unforeseen complexities. To shed light on these realities, we turn to industry insiders who have witnessed the highs and lows of Kubernetes adoption.
One sobering reality becomes evident—the risks associated with depending on a small group of individuals. As Haseeb cautions, “If your company relies solely on a few individuals, there is a danger of losing valuable intellectual property when those individuals move on to new opportunities. We often hear stories of companies entrusting crucial tasks to their engineers, only to have them leave, taking their expertise with them and leaving the organisation vulnerable.” The transient nature of talent presents a significant challenge that requires careful consideration. Intellectual property, painstakingly developed and nurtured, can vanish overnight, forcing enterprises to scramble in order to regain lost ground.
Initially, Kubernetes’ allure may overshadow its maintenance’s hidden costs. As Haseeb cautions, “The cost of maintaining these platforms is high, but it’s not just about people not understanding. If you’ve been in the industry for 3/4 years, you know the importance of addressing customer needs and leveraging their insights to build successful solutions”. The truth dawns upon organisations as they grapple with the financial burden and the intricate knowledge required to keep the platform running smoothly. While the intention behind adopting Kubernetes may be noble, the reality of ongoing costs and customer needs can quickly alter the perception.
Amidst the challenges and complexities, a glimmer of hope emerges. The market strives for standardisation, with a few key players set to dominate the Kubernetes landscape. As Haseeb optimistically states, “This market is poised to standardise on certain platforms due to the significant profit potential. It’s not merely about selling a product; it’s about empowering customers with the clarity that their lives can genuinely be improved”. This evolution signifies a path forward where enterprises can find solace in established platforms that alleviate the burden of decision-making.
Implementing Kubernetes in modern applications is no easy feat. While the allure of container orchestration beckons, organisations must confront the realities beneath the surface. By acknowledging the risks associated with talent retention, the costs of maintenance, and the pursuit of standardisation, enterprises can navigate the Kubernetes landscape with their eyes wide open. The journey may be challenging, but with careful planning and an unwavering commitment to adaptability, the rewards of a truly scalable and efficient infrastructure await.
In today’s rapidly evolving technology landscape, businesses must stay ahead of the curve and leverage cloud technologies to drive innovation and growth. However, the complexity of these technologies can often be underestimated, leading to challenges and setbacks along the way. “As the industry continues to mature, it becomes increasingly important for vendors and service providers to educate their customers about the realities and intricacies of implementing cloud solutions, particularly Kubernetes,” Haseeb suggests
Gone are the days when companies could rely solely on a few skilled engineers to build and maintain their in-house platforms. As Haseeb emphasises, “The mindset of “build it and they will stay” has proven flawed, as talented engineers may eventually leave for better opportunities, taking valuable intellectual property with them.” This leaves organisations vulnerable, forcing them to start from scratch and reinvest precious resources in rebuilding their infrastructure. Many leaders in the industry have recognized this pattern and concluded that building everything in-house is not the most sustainable approach.
Haseeb bluntly points out that, “Even those enterprises that have already built their platforms have begun to realise the high cost of maintaining and scaling these solutions internally. Over time, they question whether it’s more efficient to focus their skilled workforce on revenue-generating activities rather than diverting their attention to infrastructure management”. This shift in mindset reflects the understanding that the true competitive advantage lies in delivering innovative applications to customers rather than building and managing the underlying infrastructure.
Cloud providers have promptly recognized this pattern and offered managed services like Azure Kubernetes Service (A.K.S.) and Google Kubernetes Engine (G.K.E.). These services aim to relieve organisations of the burden of infrastructure management, enabling them to concentrate on their primary business goals. However, vendors need to remember that cloud technologies, including Kubernetes, do not universally solve every problem. Each organisation has its own distinct requirements and challenges, necessitating open dialogues with customers to thoroughly understand their specific needs.
The goal is not to scare customers away from Kubernetes, but to foster a nurturing and educational environment where the challenges and benefits are openly discussed. Vendors should share the lessons from previous implementations, highlight potential pitfalls, and guide best practices. This collaborative approach helps customers understand the true value that Kubernetes can bring and enables them to make informed decisions about their cloud strategy.